The oldest Indian reference to Ursa Major, and the only plural ṛkṣāḥ in the Ṛgveda (verified by exhaustive search of the Aufrecht text). Griffith renders it generically as 'constellations' and does NOT translate 'Bears' — the identification rests on etymology (ṛkṣa cognate with Greek ἄρκτος, Latin ursa) and on Macdonell & Keith, Vedic Index (1912) i.114: 'Rksa, "bear," is found only once in the Rigveda... Not more frequent is the use of the word in the plural to denote the "seven bears," later called the "seven Rsis," the constellation of the "Great Bear"', citing precisely RV 1.24.10, Śatapatha Brāhmaṇa 2.1.2.4, and Taittirīya Āraṇyaka 1.11.2.
ऋक्षाः Ṛkṣāḥ
Ursa Major (the Seven Ṛṣis / Big Dipper) · α–η Ursae Majoris · Ursa Major
In the living languages
Ursa Minor (3 names)
Attestations
This is the passage that makes the Bear identification defensible. TĀ 1.11 names the Seven Ṛṣis, Atri and Agastya as dwelling 'with/among the nakṣatras' and then, in the very next breath, quotes the Ṛgvedic ṛkṣāḥ verse. It also transmits a significant variant: where RV 1.24.10 ends नक्तमेति ('goes by night'), the Āraṇyaka reads नक्षत्रमेति ('goes to the asterism'). Macdonell & Keith cite exactly this passage under their 'Rksa = Great Bear' entry.
DECISIVE FOR THE BEAR CONTROVERSY, and against it. Yāska explains ṛkṣāḥ NOT from ṛkṣa 'bear' but as 'they appear as if raised up' (udīrṇāni iva khyāyante), and quotes exactly the verse RV 1.24.10 already on file. So the oldest Indian etymologist reads ṛkṣa as a general word for star, derived from height, and knows nothing of the Bear — a point directly against the Indo-European ṛkṣa/ἄρκτος/ursa equation. The Amarakośa confirms the flattening: by the 6th century ṛkṣa is a plain neuter synonym of nakṣatra, 'a star'.