No Sanskrit text: al-Bīrūnī wrote in Arabic, and the passage survives here only in Sachau's English.
A star otherwise unrecorded in the Sanskrit tradition, preserved only because al-Bīrūnī heard of it from Śrīpāla, a scholar of Multan contemporary with him. Data: red; seen in summer; a little BELOW the meridian of Canopus; considered unlucky; standing in the south when the moon is in Pūrvabhādrapadā, on which account Hindus avoided southward travel then. Sachau translates the name as 'the beam of crucifixion', pointing to Sanskrit śūla ('stake, impaling-post') — but the Devanagari above is a reconstruction from Sachau's transliteration of an Arabic-script word and is NOT attested in any Sanskrit source; Sachau himself declines to identify the star. The identification is genuinely open: nothing prominent, red and south of Canopus is visible from Multan (30°12'N), so either the report is garbled, or 'below the meridian of Canopus' means something other than 'further south', or the object was transient.